[SM-Discuss] license of xfree86
charkins at upl.cs.wisc.edu
Sat Feb 21 07:12:57 EST 2004
True, but none so far have spoken against it.
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Hamish Greig wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:33, Casey Harkins wrote:
> > As Schabell pointed out, there seems to be a consensus here to reject the
> > new license. So the current xfree86 and xfree86-devel spells should be
> > frozen at their current versions. Perhaps there should be a news item
> > posted on the website indicating the decision?
> not sure I understand how only 8 or 9 peoples opinions are considered a
> consensus ?
More information about the SM-Discuss