[permaculture] [ Fwd: Can You See This [Revolution] Coming?

KNat knat at sprintmail.com
Sun Dec 23 08:54:10 EST 2007


Lawrence F. London, Jr. wrote:
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [SANET-MG] Can You See This [Revolution] Coming?
> Date: Sat, 22 Dec 2007 18:00:24 -0800
> From: Woody Wodraska <wodraska at MAC.COM>
> To: SANET-MG at LISTS.IFAS.UFL.EDU
>
> Can You See This [Revolution] Coming?
>
>           I have written from time to time about how we will all be
> gardeners in the future, that it’s in our genes to grow food and
> provide for ourselves. This is the way it was a couple of hundred
> years ago and further back for ten thousand years.
>
>           I don’t mean every one of us will be a gardener--there have
> always been classes of people who ordered the others about, or
> interceded with the gods, or made a living by trading--but by far the
> majority will be pretty close to the earth and live out its rhythms.
While I agree there is need for awareness of Earth Rhythm in all stages, 
I think it's important to remember we have mixing cultures and Humans 
too have rhythms. It is not just "classes," as we think of British 
leveling of rich and poor. We were never all the same 100 years age 
either. Have and have not in monetary terms is probably not the highest 
relevance. For Earth change, have and have not in dirt experience is. We 
are not necessarily going to see a sea tide of farmers (though some 
areas have disproportionate populations and will.) With people evolving 
awareness of where food comes from, the Earth Awareness is rising, yes, 
but each responds in their own way. There is a bubble in American 
Society from industrialization Baby Boom but the human pattern does not 
seem to have changed.
I was privileged to be the not strong kid who took care of the Elders 
and grew with their history as my reality. My Grandmother would listen 
to me read a sociological Study from some great theorists of cultural 
change and say "Yes, that's right. 3 generations dirt to dirt." So 
simple. Translation, a child who is raised on a farm, wants an easier 
life for themself and their parents. They have food so the are given 
education, pictures of life beyond the farm they are connected to but 
never see because there are chores to be done, yet a rich life at home 
in terms of nutrition and knowledge. They are used to food being around 
and encouraged as inventors and innovators. The land can only sustain so 
many and a portion of those children leave. They are unlanded and hire 
out to work in other things for their keep. Next generation, the 
families grow up with relationship to money. The children get some 
education, some working for others. Next generation, their children see 
choice- work, teach or be with the land. Their education includes what 
their Grandparents have told them of feet in dirt and stream (or sand 
and wave) and support from the ground (or sea.) They feel disconnected 
and seek roots. They, the gardeners who become small farmers and return 
to dirt. 3 generations dirt to dirt.
Many studies have been done of generations of immigrants, especially 
Chinese family. First generation American, had a specific delineation. 
The stages even had different names, so drew Sociologists. A different 
cultural expectation of one born here than one come here. As my 
Grandmother quickly noted, in those studies the influx was also from 
rural to urban so those studies also reflect farm to city to suburb to 
farm.
Similarly, urban renewal through gardens/farms has been most possible 
with a solid mix of displaced farmers who left because the farms were 
taken but still retain the skills and third generation wanting to 
return. I think we will find neighborhoods of second and fourth 
dominance do not have the skills and will need specific influx of people 
to return to food rhythms. (fourth may now have been inserted who look 
to try a different culture and share much with the third so is very 
trainable but doesn't have the "feel" for living with the dirt, nor the 
lore.) As immigrants come from other places they seem, to this set of 
eyes, to be part of change based not on their origin but their part of 
the cycle. New arrivals to American cities from farming cultures flow in 
to the first generation leaving farm mindset.  New arrivals from a city 
elsewhere are second or third depending on their place in the human cycle.
We focus on balance and that includes distribution of human stages. 
People moving from scratching, to sharing, to wondering, to scratching. 
Even in returning to small local systems some will grow, some will mill 
or spin, some will build tools, some will negotiate trades with other 
local systems. We are not looking to all become one stage of person. I 
think it's important we each make sure our small area has multiple 
generations of land relationships and a deliberate education of life 
outside our locality to keep the flow of human rhythms. The "revolution" 
is going back to recognizing more than one generation in planning. 
People come and go whether thru birth and death or thru choice and 
spirit. The "plans" are for the place not the people.

Peace,
Kathyann



More information about the permaculture mailing list