[NAFEX] OT: DDT (was glyphosate 41)
marillen at earthlink.net
Mon Nov 1 22:09:12 EDT 2010
Gosh, Alex. You're just too smart for me.
Could have something to do with that it's cited as fact instead of being put in the context of our current knowledge.
>From: Alexander Brands <abb7 at Lehigh.EDU>
>Sent: Oct 30, 2010 7:54 PM
>To: nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
>Subject: Re: [NAFEX] OT: DDT (was glyphosate 41)
>> From: Anton Callaway <marillen at earthlink.net>
>> To: North American Fruit Explorers <nafex at lists.ibiblio.org>
>> Subject: [NAFEX] OT: DDT (was glyphosate 41)
>> Another misleading fact that is often cited is that even after DDT's
>> ban (here), seabird eggshells >have not returned to their pre-DDT
>> thicknesses (although they have gotten significantly thicker and
>> >raptor populations have rebounded). Is this due to other chemicals
>> that influence the same >biological process? Is it due to the
>> continued use of DDT elsewhere in the world? We don't know >for
>> sure yet.
>If we don't know the reason, then how can you say the observation is
>This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
>nafex mailing list
>nafex at lists.ibiblio.org
>Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
>This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web sites.
>Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have permission!
>**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
>Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
>To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used to change other email options):
>File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
>TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
>Please do not send binary files.
>Use plain text ONLY in emails!
>NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/
More information about the nafex