[NAFEX] Interstem Apples

Ed Fackler efackler at woh.rr.com
Thu Sep 11 03:53:25 EDT 2003


Ginda:

     Yes we used the 9/111 combo extensively and the primary difference was
the amount of suckering from the MM111 which was extensive.

ed

 

Ed, did you also experiment with M9 on M111?

On Wednesday, September 10, 2003, at 12:19  PM, Ed Fackler wrote:

> Derry:
>
>      There was a mistake in the wording on my original message.  Or, 
> instead
> of MM111 it should have read MM106 and with this combination (9 on 
> MM106)
> there is no suckering at all when the lower graft union is burried.  
> We left
> the upper 2" of the 9 section exposed.  Resulting tree size was around
> 10-12' with Gala as the fruiting variety.
>
> ed
>
 
 



More information about the nafex mailing list