[freetds] M$ ODBC driver work.
ZIGLIO Frediano
Frediano.Ziglio at vodafone.com
Tue Jul 1 15:20:28 EDT 2003
>
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:46:25 -0400, "Steve Murphree" wrote:
> >
> > Diffing this thing out against the current tree would be a pretty
> > dificult thing to do, but if anyone is interested, I will diff it
> > against the 0.61 release and make a nice little (BIG) patch.
> >
> > Also, if given CVS tree access, I would integrate it into
> the current
> > tree. A big diff splatted against the tree would be too hard to
> > follow. I would incrementally integrate the code bit by bit. So if
> > the authors are interested?
>
> Steve,
>
> That sounds like excellent work. Don't bother to generate a
> patch against 0.61; it would be better to integrate your work
> into CVS. I'm inclined to grant you CVS access, but ODBC is
> largely Frediano's work, and I'm not qualified to judge the
> goodness of your work or whether your ideas dovetail with
> his. Freddy's on vacation until late July, so your timing
> could be better. :-}
>
> OTOH, the code will be very stable in the meanwhile. Why
> don't you pull a current copy of CVS, integrate your changes,
> and construct a patch from that (against CVS)? Post it to
> source forge, where Frediano (and others) will find it and
> look it over. That will give us a better idea of your style
> and direction, and provide a forum to thrash out any disagreements.
> When everyone's happy, I can turn on the commit bit.
>
> How's that by you?
>
I'm back from holiday. I had a very good holiday!!
I'll look your patch and integrate it...
I just look a bit but I don't understand the reason to separate Sybase
and MSSQL.. I'm against this..
freddy77
More information about the FreeTDS
mailing list