[cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguageToo

tomislav medak to-me at mi2.hr
Mon Feb 12 21:00:57 EST 2007


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1



drew Roberts wrote:

> No, not really unless I missed something. What is called for is a meta button 
> that would to me cover BY and BY-SA licenses. It would be nice if some 
> support "areas" were set up by CC for this as well. A Free CC list, etc.

What would be the benefit of such a meta button? It would again conflate
different licenses. There was once however the talk of using additional
color-coding for different degrees of freedom similar licenses offer,
where BY and BY-SA licenses had the same coloring. However, this really
is a minor issue.

It rather seems that what you're pushing for is a definition of 'free',
maybe something along the line of push to define 'the standard of
freedom(s)', which some people here on the list are advocating?

Tom


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFF0RvZkbN024ZV0z0RAhxAAJ4qizJ+3xvbCbH4OpEglchjp7U2ewCdGEQx
WuCfJ0wAkOF4enJNiCv2Sl4=
=IUDQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the cc-licenses mailing list