[cc-licenses] Version 3.0 -- It's Happening & With BY-SA CompatibilityLanguage Too
tomislav medak
to-me at mi2.hr
Mon Feb 12 19:24:47 EST 2007
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
drew Roberts wrote:
>> However, there's a lot of "bad blood" between free software
>> advocates and the CC, which stems primarily from CC's promotion of
>> "non-commercial" licenses,
>
> I am almost there myself, more because I have asked here on the lists over and
> repeatedly for CC to consider the creation of a Free CC logo/banner so that
> those of us who want to promote Free works can do so without giving a tcit
> stamp of approval to no-free works or furthering confusion between the two.
> there has never been a response. Even to point me to a better place / way to
> make such a request. This does not go towards gaining / maintaining my
> confidence in CC.
hey drew,
sorry for getting into this minor matter in the license compatibility
thread, but hasn't the concern of conflation of different licenses with
different degrees of freedom been addressed with the new CC buttons that
indicate what license is being used? this really does resolve the
well-founded critique that came from the free software community.
tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF0QVPkbN024ZV0z0RAuPVAJ94oe71/wWYdFt/t18FcFSFfk8/RgCgw1s7
TBD87Yk6sfoJKXByCZAJJjg=
=aloE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the cc-licenses
mailing list