[cc-licenses] � & With BY-SA Compatibility Language Too
hancock at anansispaceworks.com
Sat Feb 10 00:43:06 EST 2007
Mia Garlick wrote:
> An amended version of the draft Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 (US) license
> is posted above. Please post any comments you have to this list.
My personal top priority would be to see the "Free Art License" and the
"Design Science License" be declared compatible with "By-SA".
However, I really want the *reverse* compatibility (i.e. blanket
permission to relicense derivatives of DSL and FAL works to By-SA --- or
By-SA+DSL+FAL triple-licensing, which is just fine with me).
Of course, I suspect that the TPM issue is going to keep snapping back
up to bite us in all of these cases. :-(
Terry Hancock (hancock at AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com
More information about the cc-licenses