CC-License for Transclusion
evan at bad.dynu.ca
Tue Apr 19 17:43:25 EDT 2005
On Thu, Apr 07, 2005 at 09:49:21AM -0700, Mike Linksvayer wrote:
> If transclusion is what I think it is (including external content, or in
> the concrete web case, including part of one web page in another wbe
> page), why do you need a separate license? The existing CC licenses, at
> least those that permit derivatives, would handle that case, no?
That kind of begs the question of whether transclusion is making a
derivative work or making a collective work.
More information about the cc-licenses