[cc-devel] Malformed HTML in CC licences
jonathan at creativecommons.org
Tue Jan 10 17:46:24 EST 2012
Ignoring the attribute errors, the deeds should be well-formed now.
The template file common to most of the deeds and the one common to
the public domain tool use different doctypes from one another. In
the later case, the doctype is xhtml+rdfa. I've opened up a new bug
ticket for this - code.creativecommons.org/issues/issue1010
If the doctype xhtml+rdfa was used, then it should be possible to have
no validation issues what so ever. Would there be a good reason not
to do this?
More information about the cc-devel