[cc-community] The case for a stricter (or more honest) CC licence than BY-NC-ND
Javier Candeira
javier at candeira.com
Wed Jan 21 23:39:56 EST 2009
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 1:40 PM, jonathon <jonathon.blake at gmail.com> wrote:
> Christoph Schiller wrote:
> The sticking point is always going to be: "What constitutes non-primary
> revenue generation?"
I don't know whether this has been touched upon, but if I put a
CC-BY-NC work up for download, my ISP is making money from it being
copied; ¿wouldnt that be "non-primary" revenue? I know the US has
"safe-harbor" provisions, but the CC licenses are meant to be
worldwide, and the "non primary revenue generation" would cover such a
case in other circumscriptions.
Also non-primary revenue is that of a copycenter that charges me for
copying the book (or for printing by the page).
Aren't these the type of cases that the "non-primary" language were
supposed to cover?
Javier C
More information about the cc-community
mailing list