[cc-community] creative commons advice
Dr. Peter Troxler (Waag Society)
peter at waag.org
Sat Jan 3 11:26:06 EST 2009
On 31 dec 2008, at 02:23, drew Roberts wrote:
> My thoughts would be BY if you expect the content to be throwaway in
> nature or
> BY-SA if you expect the content to be more substantial. A lot of us
> are
> unlikely to use BY for substantial works. Or have BY and BY-SA us user
> profile options.
Drew, I think you are adding an interpretation of BY / BY-SA here
which I'd love you to expand on:
BY = throwaway
BY-SA = (more) substantial
For me the one thing that BY-SA actually adds to the BY license is the
viral element or notion of commons, i.e. that a work remains in the
realm of the commons (a bit like the difference between BSD and GPL).
So am I right understanding that your interpretation has to be read
with a copyleft background?
If so, could then your advice be rephrased as:
BY if you intend the content to be reused in copyright and copyleft
environments
BY-SA if you intend the content to be reused in copyleft environments
only
best
/ Peter Troxler
/ Public Project Co-Lead
/ Creative Commons Netherlands
/ www.creativecommons.nl
/
/ c/o Waag Society :: Nieuwmarkt 4 :: 1012 CR Amsterdam :: The
Netherlands :: +31 20 557 9898
More information about the cc-community
mailing list