[cc-community] What does NC means?
drew Roberts
zotz at 100jamz.com
Sun Sep 16 09:41:34 EDT 2007
On Saturday 15 September 2007 11:51 pm, Fred Benenson wrote:
> I think cc-by-nc-nd might be what you're looking for, considering the
> wishes of the group you're working for, but I think the thing you
> should avoid doing is calling it libre or "free" as that has a very
> specific denotation.
I don't really think so.
I think this:
> > Recasting to any instruments, music genres, several voices, etc. is
> > perfectly fine and expected. The hymnal does not specify anything on
> > this. It is only lyrics and melody of lyrics.
rules out ND. Right? Wrong? If wrong, why?
And I think this:
> > All the authors in this effort want to "give" their songs, so churches
> > can use them freely without having to pay royalties, annualities, etc.
Rules out NC. Right? Wrong? If wrong, why?
>
> F
all the best,
drew
>
>
>
> On Sep 16, 2007, at 12:43 AM, Enrique Vargas <enrique.vargas at jyestudio.com
>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Interesting information. Let me add info.
> >
> > Nothing in the hymnal is PD. Actually, everything is new.
> >
> > The validation is a verification that the hymns had liturgical value.
> >
> > The hymnal is as simple as it get: Only lyrics, main melody of the
> > lyrics and suggested chords. So it is in the lyrics and melodies we
> > don't want changes.
> >
> > Recasting to any instruments, music genres, several voices, etc. is
> > perfectly fine and expected. The hymnal does not specify anything on
> > this. It is only lyrics and melody of lyrics.
> >
> > For things like translations, changes in words, etc, authors want to
> > be
> > contacted first. Actually, if somebody wants to use a song for other
> > than to sing in the church, authors want to be contacted first.
> >
> > The idea is to place the hymnal as a PDF on the Internet, so everybody
> > can download it and print it and use it at their church.
> >
> > All the authors in this effort want to "give" their songs, so churches
> > can use them freely without having to pay royalties, annualities, etc.
> > They want to clearly state that they don't want this work to be used
> > for
> > profit. So, if using CC BY-NC-ND is not a good way to say this, I
> > really
> > want to hear what is the best way.
> >
> > Regards;
> > Enrique
> > _______________________________________________
> > cc-community mailing list
> > cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
>
> _______________________________________________
> cc-community mailing list
> cc-community at lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-community
>
> !DSPAM:46eca8e431661804284693!
More information about the cc-community
mailing list