[b-hebrew] Vav Nun Suffix

Isaac Fried if at math.bu.edu
Sat Nov 20 19:59:22 EST 2010


1. I think that what you mean by "vocabulary" is the root stock of  
the Hebrew language. I believe that the multi-consonantal Hebrew root  
is a merger of uni-consonantal roots.

2. I don't "decree" anything, I merely express my belief that the I  
and U (also E and O) sounds in the Hebrew word are identity markers.  
The ancient Hebrews did not waste the I and U sounds just for  
twitting and tutting like birds.

3. The ancient Hebrews did not construct their language by means of  
"prefixes", "infixes" and "suffixes".

4. The Hebrew language is "primitive" in the sense that in it word =  
root + identity markers. Nothing can be simpler, or more "primitive",  
than that.

Isaac Fried, Boston University

On Nov 20, 2010, at 4:42 AM, Arnaud Fournet wrote:

>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Isaac Fried" <if at math.bu.edu>
> To: "Arnaud Fournet" <fournet.arnaud at wanadoo.fr>
> Cc: "Pere Porta" <pporta7 at gmail.com>; "Hebrew List" <b- 
> hebrew at lists.ibiblio.org>
> Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2010 5:27 PM
> Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] Vav Nun Suffix
>
>
>> In any event, language developed spontaneously and by agreement  
>> (no  books nor schools) by "simple" people and hence "primitive"  
>> languages  like Hebrew must have (or have had) a very simple  
>> logical inner  structure.
> ***
> I really do not see any reason to think Hebrew is "primitive".
> Even though the bulk of vocabulary of Ancient Hebrew may be small,  
> especially when compared to classical Arabic, this is probably  
> caused by the nature of the documentation, not a feature of the  
> language per se.
> A.
> ***
>
>
>> In my opinion Hebrew is basically a primeval language that  has  
>> retained this fundamental "grammar": word = root + identifiers   
>> (personal pronouns). The identifiers were the sounds I and U.
> ***
> There's nothing fundamental in that typology.
> This is just something you decree.
> In addition vocalic schemes amount to infixes, and infixes are a  
> complex feature.
> A.
> ***
>
>
>> There is, and there can't be, anything "deeper".
>>
>> Isaac Fried, Boston university
> ***
> "there can't be".
> ok => decree
>
> Arnaud Fournet




More information about the b-hebrew mailing list