tensorpath at gmail.com
Thu Dec 30 15:05:50 EST 2010
nice conclusions, even conclusions dressed up in colorful latin phrases,
.... fall down in the absence of facts.
your conclusions sound convincing ... but facts supporting them ... exist
On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 1:43 PM, K Randolph <kwrandolph at gmail.com> wrote:
> This logical fallacy I can name, “*Ignoratio elenchi*”.
> Look it up in http://www.wikinfo.org/index.php/Ignoratio_elenchi
> Karl W. Randolph.
> On Thu, Dec 30, 2010 at 10:47 AM, fred burlingame <tensorpath at gmail.com>wrote:
>> the entire document serves as the proper context .... for any piece or
>> part of the language in a single verse, including the proper antonyms,
>> many & few (versus improper antonyms many & one).
>> hence, 1 samuel 13:13-14; 16:1-15; invests 2 samuel 3:1 with
>> implicit disapproval of saul and corresponding approval of david; saul
>> weakened and david strengthened by wives and children.
>> fred burlingame
More information about the b-hebrew