[b-hebrew] What Is "Hebron"?
JimStinehart at aol.com
JimStinehart at aol.com
Mon May 12 09:38:00 EDT 2008
Bill Rea wrote: “You have argued in this manner for a long time and it’s
still unconvincing. How do we know they ``forgot'' to add in Jerusalem? It is
just a guess. Let's for a moment take a different line of speculation. Let's
say that these editors were working with what they believed to be sacred
traditions. I use traditions to mean either written or oral or both. Why would
they add in a reference to Jerusalem when the readers or hearers could already
make that association if they figured that association was important? We could
speculate that they wouldn't add it in out of reverence for the traditions.”
1. You and I agree as to the following. (a) The Hebrews had sacred
traditions regarding the Patriarchal narratives. (b) Jerusalem was not part of
those sacred traditions. (c) Nothing about Jerusalem was put into the
Patriarchal narratives, “out of reverence for the traditions”.
So far, so good.
2. But from what geographical locale are the sacred traditions of the
Patriarchal narratives coming?
(a) If there are multiple authors of the Patriarchal narratives, and most of
them came from Jerusalem, doesn’t it seem odd that Jerusalem is not part of
these sacred traditions?
(b) If there are multiple authors of the Patriarchal narratives, and most of
them came from southern Canaan, doesn’t it seem odd that all of these authors
from southern Canaan would use non-existent geography in southern Canaan?
Wouldn’t their audience be mostly from southern Canaan? Why use non-existent
geography, from the immediate neighborhood of your audience? Is that a
plausible theory of the case?
Shouldn’t we examine the 12 cities in Canaan near which the Patriarchs are
portrayed as sojourning in the Patriarchal narratives? Everyone agrees that two
of those cities -- Shechem and Dothan -- are historical cities from Late
Bronze Age northern Canaan, attested by those very names in secular history. What
about the other 10 cities?
Scholars tells us that the other 10 cities are fictional cities in southern
Canaan. Does that seem reasonable?
Scholars will often admit, however, if asked about a specific city, that such
a city name is attested in secular history as the name of a Late Bronze Age
city in northern Canaan. Isn’t that relevant information? Is that true as to
all 10 such cities?
3. Consider if you will this phrase as to where Jacob sojourned after the
bloody Shechem incident:
“And Israel journeyed, and spread his tent beyond Migdal-eder.” Genesis 35:
21
Is “Migdal-eder” a fictional city in southern Canaan? Is it the case that
there are multiple authors of the Patriarchal narratives, who are using
non-existent geography here?
Or should we instead ask if these are attested names of Late Bronze Age
cities in northern Canaan?
In this post, let’s focus on the name “Migdal”: mem-gimel-dalet-lamed.
Migdal is a well-attested city in Late Bronze Age northern Canaan, located at
modern Tel Zeror. It is #115 on the list of Canaanite cities that Egyptian
pharaoh Thutmosis III conquered in the mid-15th century BCE. It’s noted at p.
201 of the following Internet site:
_https://oa.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/4162/TMP.objres.80.pdf?sequence=1_
(https://oa.doria.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/4162/TMP.objres.80.pdf?sequence=1)
Here is how Anson Rainey sets it forth as item #71 on p. 73 of “The Sacred
Bridge”: “ma-k-ta-la. Cf. EA [Amarna Letter] towns…. Cf. [the Hebrew letters]
mem-gimel-dalet-lamed”.
(Egyptian K routinely becomes G/gimel in Biblical Hebrew. Egyptian T can
either stay T/tav, or become D/dalet, in Biblical Hebrew.)
And pursuant to Anson Rainey’s comment, what about the Amarna Letters from
the mid-14th century BCE? Magdalu/Migdal at Amarna Letter EA 256: 24 could well
be referencing historical Migdal, just south of Megiddo. The U at the end of
a place name in the Amarna Letters always is omitted in the Biblical Hebrew
equivalent. The other precise vowel sounds are unknown from the unpointed text
of Biblical Hebrew. If “Garu”/Gar/G-R in this Amarna Letter is
G-R-R/G-L-L/greater Galilee, then Migdal/Magdalu south of Megiddo in Lower Galilee fits
perfectly here.
4. All 12 cities near which the Patriarchs are portrayed as sojourning are
like that. They do not exist in southern Canaan. But they are attested by
name as Late Bronze Age cities in northern Canaan.
5. Is it likely that 5 out of 6 authors of the Patriarchal narratives came
from southern Canaan in the 1st millennium BCE, and never used a single
historical name of a city in southern Canaan near which the Patriarchs are portrayed
as sojourning, and rather in every case used non-existent geography in
southern Canaan, with all 12 city names in the text just “happening” to match up to
attested names of Late Bronze Age cities in northern Canaan?
I myself do not see that as a plausible scenario.
Rather, in my view, the sacred traditions of the Patriarchal narratives are
coming from Late Bronze Age northern Canaan, not from 1st millennium BCE
southern Canaan. All of the cities near which the Patriarchs are portrayed as
sojourning in the text are attested by name in the secular history of Late Bronze
Age northern Canaan. No such cities exist in southern Canaan in ancient times.
As I see it, the Patriarchal narratives are both older, and from a more
northerly locale, than currently realized. There is no fictional southern Canaan
geography in the Patriarchal narratives. Rather, what we have is pinpoint
accurate historical geography from Late Bronze Age northern Canaan. The names of
the cities in the received text tell the tale. The Patriarchal narratives are
very old, and are coming from northern Canaan, not from 1st millennium BCE
Jerusalem.
Jim Stinehart
Evanston, Illinois
**************Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family
favorites at AOL Food.
(http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001)
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list