[b-hebrew] "Shaf`el" in Hebrew?

Bearpecs at aol.com Bearpecs at aol.com
Sun Feb 6 10:49:44 EST 2005


 
In a message dated 2/5/2005 9:36:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,  
kwrandolph at email.com writes:

The  above pattern has neither the place nor the need for a "shafel"  form.


The "above pattern" is a late construct.  The niph'al, for example,  was 
originally a reflexive, not a passive.  Of course you "have found that  pattern to 
fit the use in Hebrew quite well", because it was created to fit the  
then-current use.  The pattern was not intended to incorporate diachronic  reality.  
The idea that Tanakh retains some archaic verb forms is no more  surprising 
than that it occasionally retains archaic words.
 
 



More information about the b-hebrew mailing list