[b-hebrew] "Shaf`el" in Hebrew?
Bearpecs at aol.com
Bearpecs at aol.com
Sun Feb 6 10:49:44 EST 2005
In a message dated 2/5/2005 9:36:59 PM Eastern Standard Time,
kwrandolph at email.com writes:
The above pattern has neither the place nor the need for a "shafel" form.
The "above pattern" is a late construct. The niph'al, for example, was
originally a reflexive, not a passive. Of course you "have found that pattern to
fit the use in Hebrew quite well", because it was created to fit the
then-current use. The pattern was not intended to incorporate diachronic reality.
The idea that Tanakh retains some archaic verb forms is no more surprising
than that it occasionally retains archaic words.
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list