virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_
Moshe Shulman
mshulman at ix.netcom.com
Tue Jan 30 12:26:47 EST 2001
At 12:11 AM 1/30/01 -0600, Christian M. M. Brady wrote:
>On 1/29/01 11:40 AM, "Moshe Shulman" <mshulman at ix.netcom.com> wrote:
> > At 05:14 AM 1/29/01 -0500, Dan Wagner wrote:
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jonathan D. safren [mailto:yonsaf at beitberl.ac.il]
> >>> Sent: Monday, January 29, 2001 04:17
> >>> To: Biblical Hebrew
> >>> Subject: Re: virgin: _BETHULAH_ and/or _(ALMAH_
> >>> If the verse is to be viewed in context, which is the
> >>> only basis for
> >>> philological - and not Christological - discussion,
> >> .. except that you should recognize that Christology (Messiahism) is an
> >> important component of Biblical Hebrew thought. They cannot be divorced.
> >> Nevertheless, i will keep to philology for the remainder of this post.
> > That is ONLY true for those who are evangelical Christians.
>Not really, for lots of reasons, but I will offer only one: the expectation
>of the messiah was not new to the followers of Jesus and most of the
>passages interpreted by the NT authors as messianic either already had those
>overtones in the Tanakh or were already understood in that vein before Jesus
>was a glimmer in anyone's eye.
But this is irrelevant to the words in the text.
>Now, you may be right, Moshe, in assessing Dan's personal position, but that
>is another issue.
:)
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
moshe shulman mshulman at NOSPAMix.netcom.com 718-436-7705
CHASSIDUS.NET - Yoshav Rosh http://www.chassidus.net
Chassidus shiur: chassidus-subscribe at chassidus.net
Chassidus discussion list: chassidus-subscribe at egroups.com
Outreach Judaism http://www.outreachjudaism.org/
ICQ# 52009254 Yahoo/MSN Messaging: mosheshulman
More information about the b-hebrew
mailing list