Is hakhal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX

Ben Crick ben.crick at argonet.co.uk
Sat Jul 22 18:41:25 EDT 2000


On Sat 22 Jul 2000 (14:08:02), daladier at elogica.com.br wrote:
> Is qahal the correspondent substantive to ekklesia in LXX?

 Yes, generally: see Acts 7:38 ... EH THi EKKLHSIAi EN THi ERHMWi, KTL.

 Compare Deuteronomy 18:16,  BaYYoWM HaQQaHaL ....

 Shalom
 Ben
-- 
 Revd Ben Crick, BA CF
 <ben.crick at argonet.co.uk>
 232 Canterbury Road, Birchington, Kent, CT7 9TD (UK)
 http://www.cnetwork.co.uk/crick.htm






More information about the b-hebrew mailing list