ruth 1.17 oath

yochanan bitan ButhFam at compuserve.com
Sun Dec 27 07:49:39 EST 1998


here is a possibly ambiguous oath, with a footnote that is given to
students:

ko ya`ase Y"H li vexo yosif
ki ha-mavet yafrid beni uvenex

for b-hebrew:
a. thus may He do and double do...[if I do otherwise]..., 
     indeed death will be what separates us [nothing else].
b. thus may He do and double do
     if even death will separate us. [i.e. death will not separate us]

my own answer from a footnote for students:
        ki after the curse/oath formula generally introduces something
affirmed. Here it is death and only death that will separate Ruth from
No`omi. 
        For the oath to mean 'if even death would separate...', 'even death
will not...'  
one would have expected im 'if' [=certainly NOT] or possibly ki-im (cf. 2
Sm 3.35). 
        Cf. 1 Sm 14.44, 20.13, 2 Sm 3.9, 1 K 2.23, 19.2 (19.2 with plural
verbs for gods!).
        In oaths in general, im will introduce the condition being sworn
against (=he will NOT do it), while 
im-lo will introduce something that the person swears to not let not happen
(=he will certainly do it).



More information about the b-hebrew mailing list