On Fri, 02 Apr 2010 13:58:33 -0700<snip>
Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us> wrote:
Quoting Florian Franzmann <scm AT sourcemage.org>:
> GIT changes to devel-gcc grimoire by Florian Franzmann
> <siflfran AT hawo.stw.uni-erlangen.de>:
>
> ChangeLog | 8 ++++++
> gnu/FUNCTIONS | 72
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit 3e53b3605c6c8510c44147499b278a9cf2a15ac5
> Author: Florian Franzmann <siflfran AT hawo.stw.uni-erlangen.de>
> Commit: Florian Franzmann <siflfran AT hawo.stw.uni-erlangen.de>
>
> gnu/FUNCTIONS: - default_build_configure_gcc: specified bug url, pass
> CFLAGS, BOOT_CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS to configure
> - default_build_make_gcc: use make_single
> - default_build_install_gcc: LIBRARY is passed as a parameter now,
> installing compiler1 is the spell's responsibility
>
> diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog
> index e48822b..bbecf35 100644
> --- a/ChangeLog
> +++ b/ChangeLog
> @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
> +2010-04-02 Florian Franzmann <siflfran AT hawo.stw.uni-erlangen.de>
> + * gnu/FUNCTIONS:
> + - default_build_configure_gcc: specified bug url, pass
> + CFLAGS, BOOT_CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS to configure
> + - default_build_make_gcc: use make_single
> + - default_build_install_gcc: LIBRARY is passed as a parameter now,
> + installing compiler1 is the spell's responsibility
> +
> 2010-04-02 Arwed v. Merkatz <v.merkatz AT gmx.net>
> * gnome2-libs/libgdata: new spell, glib based GData protocol
> implementation
> diff --git a/gnu/FUNCTIONS b/gnu/FUNCTIONS
> index eb720d1..2bd917b 100755
> --- a/gnu/FUNCTIONS
> +++ b/gnu/FUNCTIONS
> @@ -69,10 +77,10 @@ function default_build_configure_gcc ()I had a build failure a few days ago in one of the gnu spells. I'm not
> function default_build_make_gcc ()
> {
> cd ${SOURCE_DIRECTORY}.bld &&
> -#make_single &&
> + make_single &&
Is there a reason you brought make_single back? Besides that it's
recommended by the GNU devs? :)
sure if we need make_single, the spell asks if it should continue
building with one process and completes the build just fine. Should I
remove make_single under these circumstances?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.