Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] GIT changes to master z-rejected grimoire by Anton Brondz (e8641d83833730de24224232a3d264f41bef745c)
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 12:20:12 -0700
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Anton Brondz wrote:
> GIT changes to master z-rejected grimoire by Anton Brondz
> <dinolinux AT gmail.com>:
>
> z-x11/ttf-lido/DETAILS | 2 +-
> z-x11/ttf-lido/HISTORY | 4 ++++
> z-x11/ttf-lido/INSTALL | 7 +------
> 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> New commits:
> commit e8641d83833730de24224232a3d264f41bef745c
> Author: Anton Brondz <dinolinux AT gmail.com>
> Commit: Anton Brondz <dinolinux AT gmail.com>
>
> Fixed wrong sha512sum and removed bad cp
<snip>
When 'fixing' wrong hashsums you should describe what changes were made
(this can be brief) so that we (and the users) know that the tarball is
'safe'.
e.g.
DETAILS: Tarball changed as upstream fixed spelling mistakes in
documentation, but didn't increment their version (/spank upstream).