From: Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>
To: Juuso Alasuutari <iuso AT sourcemage.org>
Cc: duane_malcolm <d.malcolm AT auckland.ac.nz>, Unet <unet AT sourcemage.org>, SM-Commit Daemon <sm-commit AT lists.ibiblio.org>, Andrew Stitt <a AT t.armory.com>, Arjan Bouter <abouter AT sourcemage.org>, vladimir_marek <vlmarek AT volny.cz>, Maurizio Boriani <baux AT member.fsf.org>, Ethan Grammatikidis <eekee AT eekee.is-a-geek.org>, Gareth Clay <gareth AT caffeinefuelled.co.uk>
Subject: Re: [SM-Commit] PERFORCE change 79107 by Juuso Alasuutari for review
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 16:07:03 -0500
On May 10, Perforce Review Daemon [p4review AT smee.org] wrote:
> Change 79107 by juuso_alasuutari@juuso_alasuutari-kamayuq on 2006/05/10
> 21:18:26
>
> Fixed usb printer node naming, added new rules, added new
> keywords
There's been a lot of this tweaking going on lately, and 50-default.rules
has 224 lines by now, and the spell is looking quite complex overall. Can
I ask for a sanity check... are we still installing only upstream + the
minimal config to make things work and leaving the rest for the local admin
to take care of? Or at least making all the helpful autoconfiguration
optional?