Arwed von Merkatz wrote:<snip>
I don't like that wording, since we don't require everything to be GPL
compatible. The one real problem with the pine license is that it only
allows distributing patches, not modified versions. The normal wording
for such spells in z-rejected is "has licensing issues", I think that's
better.
Yeah, we've had a small discussion on #sourcemage and in other emails.
It reads "has licensing issues" now.
But on a side note, the Social Contract says that we only include "GPL
Compatible" spells. Needs to be reworded.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.