[permaculture] 'This Will Be the Biggest Loss of Clean Water Protection the Country Has Ever Seen': Trump Finalizes Clean Water Rule Replacement - EcoWatch
To: sustagnet@googlegroups.com, permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [permaculture] 'This Will Be the Biggest Loss of Clean Water Protection the Country Has Ever Seen': Trump Finalizes Clean Water Rule Replacement - EcoWatch
"This will be the biggest loss of clean water protection the country has
ever seen," Southern Environmental Law Center
<https://www.southernenvironment.org/> lawyer Blan Holman told The New York
Times. "This puts drinking water
<https://www.ecowatch.com/tag/drinking-water> for millions of Americans at
risk of contamination from unregulated pollution. This is not just undoing
the Obama rule. This is stripping away protections that were put in place
in the '70s and '80s that Americans have relied on for their health."
The administration announced the repeal
<https://www.ecowatch.com/trump-admin-repeals-protections-for-smaller-streams-and-wetlands-2640338564.html>
of the WOTUS rule, also known as the Clean Water Rule, in September of
2019. That rule had expanded the definition of "waters of the United
States" under the 1972 Clean Water Act from larger bodies of water to
include streams and wetlands. The rule was controversial before Trump took
office. Many farmers and businesses thought it gave the federal government
too much power, and court rulings had suspended it in 28 states.
"I terminated one of the most ridiculous regulations of all: the last
administration's disastrous Waters of the United States rule," he said.
"Thank you. It's gone. That was a rule that basically took your property
away from you."
However, the rule was also based on a review of 1,200 scientific studies
that found that streams and wetlands were connected to waters downstream.
And legal experts say Trump's replacement goes even further than repealing
the 2015 rule to deny decades-old protections to smaller headwaters.
"This is rolling back federal jurisdiction of the Clean Water Act further
than it's ever been before," Vermont Law School environmental law professor
Patrick Parenteau told The New York Times "Waters that have been protected
for almost 50 years will no longer be protected under the Clean Water Act."
The science behind Trump's new rule is already being challenged, including
by some of Trump's own appointees.
The board's comments will likely prove useful to environmental groups and
the attorneys general of several states, who are expected to sue to block
the new rule, The New York Times reported.
"The legal standing all has to do with whether you have a rational basis
for what you're doing," Parenteau told The New York Times. "And when you
have experts saying you're not adhering to the science, that's not
rational, it's arbitrary."
The rule is also already being challenged by Public Employees for
Environmental Responsibility <https://www.peer.org/>, which has called for
an investigation into how it was finalized, E&E News reported Monday
<https://www.eenews.net/stories/1062132563>.
"The writing of the final Rule was controlled solely by [EPA] Headquarters
political appointees," the complaint, signed by 44 current and former EPA
employees, said. "The final Rule contradicts the overwhelming scientific
consensus on the connectivity of wetlands and waters, and the impacts that
ephemeral streams and so-called 'geographically isolated' wetlands have on
downstream navigable waters."
The group filed the complaint with the EPA's Office of Inspector General
and asked it to determine if the rule violated the agency's Scientific
Integrity Policy.
[permaculture] 'This Will Be the Biggest Loss of Clean Water Protection the Country Has Ever Seen': Trump Finalizes Clean Water Rule Replacement - EcoWatch,
Lawrence London, 01/28/2020