> This assumes that my comments were bigoted - please explain why my
> comments were bigoted.
Dear Bob,
I am an Australian living in the U.S.A. and seeing this dialogue has
made me rethink a lot of the things I say about Americans. I've indulged
in rants against "Amerikans" (why the weird spelling by the way?) but it's
really not the right thing to do. Because the USA is so powerful it
doesn't seem so politically incorrect to rip into it's citizens as a
group. The problem with doing this is that regardless of the relative
power of the people involved, it's unfair to treat individuals as though
they necessarily conform to the average standard of the group they belong
to. Anti-Americanism is just as intellectually lazy as racism or sexism.
If you think that you weren't stereotyping Americans, then just go back
to the letters you posted and change "amerikans" to "women" "negroes", or
"asians". The results sound pretty scary. I was thinking of doing exactly
that and posting them without comment but I didn't want anyone to take it
the wrong way.
Unfortunately the very relevant points that you made about skepticism,
american education and the media were framed by aggressive language that
made people react emotionally and not hear the sense in what you said. You
might want to think about the way you communicate in future. Marshall
Rosenburg's book "non-violent communication" has been very helpful to many
people I know.
You said: "locally based administrations that lead to creation science
being taught in schools. Never happen here except in privately run
religious schools."
This is false. I am 25 years old and from 1st grade through 6th grade I
attended mandatory scripture classes at three different public schools in
Australia during which I was taught creation science along with every other
child in my school. Although there are some discrepancies such as the
Kansas ruling that you pointed out (which is limited to a couple of states)
religious education is illegal in the USA in public schools. I would be
very happy to hear if this is now also the case in Australia but if so I
don't think it is something we should crow too loudly about.
You said: " I'm sure there are many intelligent citizens in your country
but every one of them that I've got to know personally has had marked
gaps in their knowledge about ideas and the rest of the world."
All people have gaps in their knowledge. To imply that this is
uniquely American is absurd. In my experience the AVERAGE level of
environmental awareness amongst Americans does seem lower than in Australia
but being involved in Permaculture education I have found the general
receptivity to also be higher than it is in Oz. Everyone I know who says
they are practicing Permaculture here seem like real overachievers, usually
involving themselves in ecovillage design, renewable energy practices,
overseas aid work, amazing urban permaculture food forests etc. Although
this is sometimes true in Oz, I know quite a few Australians who say they
are practicing Permaculture just because they sheet mulch the veggie
patch. Personally if I had a choice between dealing with the gaps in
knowledge of the people on this list versus some prominent Australians I
could name (you know who I'm talking about) give me the Yanks any day!
Charlie Knoles
Fairfield Iowa
P.S Have you ever heard of Bioneers, ATTRA, Noam Chomsky, Hunter Lovins,
Howard Zinn, Paul Stamets, Winonna La Duke, Nancy and John Todd, Anna Edey,
Michael and Judy Corbett .... jeez, I could go on all day. These are all
"amerikans" too.