To: Perm Practitioner <permaculture@listserv.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: Re: Consumer Food News, November 1998
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1998 07:53:01 +1200
FYI
Bob Phelps wrote:
> To subscribe or comment contact:
> "Dick Copeman" <eco-cons@bit.net.au>
>
> November 1998
> CONSUMER FOOD NEWS
>
> PRUNING OF FOOD CODE SPEEDS UP
>
> The reform (and reduction) of food regulation in Australia
> and New Zealand is speeding up, as indicated by the
> summaries below. Full copies can be obtained from:
>
> Australia New Zealand Food Authority,
> PO Box 7186, Canberra MC, ACT 2610,
> ph 02 6271 2222, fax 02 6271 2278,
> e-mail <info@anzfa.gov.au>.
>
> Please respond to them by the dates shown.
>
> A338, A431, A346, A355, A362, A363:
> Foods Produced Using Gene Technology
> Monsanto has lodged the first applications under the
> recently gazetted standard for foods produced using gene
> technology. They seek approval for soybeans, corn, canola
> oil and cottonseed derived from genetically modified
> plants. The plants have been genetically engineered to be
> resistant to the herbicide glyphosate (Roundup) or to be
> resistant to insects, through incorporation of a gene from
> the bacterium Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt).
> The Consumer Food Network has obtained copies of the
> Monsanto applications (copies available from the Network).
> Perusal of these reveals that only two of the six foods,
> Roundup-Ready soybeans and Bt cottonseed, have been tested
> by feeding them to laboratory animals, and then only for
> four weeks. Rats fed Bt cottonseed gained less weight in
> the first week than rats on a control diet, and male rats
> were still lower in weight at the end of the trial.
> No evidence was provided about herbicide residue levels in
> any of the Roundup-Ready foods, despite the fact that ANZFA
> is currently considering a request from Monsanto for the
> Maximum Residue Level for glyphosate in soybeans to be
> relaxed from 0.1mg/kg to 20 mg/kg.
> ¨ Comments due by 23rd December
>
> P169: Representational Issues about Food
> This proposal would remove a number of specific regulations
> governing labelling of foods. Claims about kosher, halal
> and other foods prepared in accordance with religious or
> cultural prescriptions would no longer be regulated, nor
> would the use of endorsements such as the Heart
> Foundation's Tick of Approval. Other regulations to be
> removed include those covering:-
> use of the word 'style', as in 'home-style' or
> 'Italian-style';
> use of the name of one food to describe another, as in
> 'coconut milk' or 'peanut butter';
> declaration of the percentage content of ingredients that
> are given emphasis on the label; and
> negative claims about the absence or non-addition of a
> substance .
> These claims would be regulated only by the general
> prohibitions on false, misleading or deceptive
> representations. Non-prescriptive Guidelines for Claims
> about Foods are proposed to assist food businesses avoid
> misleading or deceiving consumers.
> (Health claims, nutrition claims and nutrient claims are
> being considered in other proposals.)
> ¨ Comments due by 30th November
>
> P187: Fruit and Vegetables
> This proposal would remove quality factors such as mould
> in canned tomatoes, green pigmentation in potatoes and the
> peanut content of peanut butter from food regulations and
> put them into industry guidelines. A pH (acidity)
> requirement for canned fruit and vegetables would be the
> only quality factor that would remain, because it is
> important in controlling the growth of Botulism spores.
> ¨ Comments due by 30th November
>
> P185: Milk, Cream, Fermented Milks and related products
> This proposal specifies the requirements for
> pasteurisation of milk and milk products but leaves open
> the possibility of other methods of making milk
> microbiologically safe.
> It would allow, for the first time in Australia, milk
> whose protein and fat content has been altered, to be still
> called 'milk' and not 'modified milk', as long as the
> composition of the milk was still within the usual range.
> It would also increase the allowable fat content of 'low
> fat milk'.
> It would remove current regulations governing:-
> cooling, storage, handling and homogenisation of milk;
> chemical and antibiotic residues in milk;
> addition of water to milk;
> packaging of milk and cream; and
> the content of fruit yoghurts.
> Some of these regulations would be replaced by an industry
> code of practice. Nutrient claims, such as 'low fat', would
> be subject only to the existing voluntary Code of Practice
> for Nutrient Claims.
> ¨ Comments due by 30th November.
>
> P186: Cheese, butter and edible oil spreads
> This proposal signals an intent to move away from a
> requirement that all milk be pasteurised during the cheese
> making process, but would leave in place interim standards
> until new HACCP systems are approved.
> It would also remove:-
> requirements for declaration of fat content in cheese;
> requirements for designation of cheese varieties;
> limits on the use of milk-fats in margarines;
> specifications for use of the terms 'polyunsaturated' and
> 'monounsaturated'.
> ¨ Comments due by 30th November.
>
> P164: Representational Issues ? Quality Descriptors
> This proposal would remove current regulations governing
> use of words such as 'fresh', 'freshly squeezed',
> 'natural', 'traditional' and 'pure' to describe foods. Only
> the general prohibitions in food law and fair trading law
> on false, misleading and deceptive representations would
> remain to regulate use of these terms, but the Food
> Authority proposes to develop a guide to assist food
> manufacturers comply with food law and fair trading law.
> Draft definitions of the descriptors for inclusion in the
> guide are included in the proposal.
> ¨ Comments due by 23rd December
>
> P150: Food Additives
> This proposal sets maximum permitted levels for food
> additives in a range of foods. For certain foods, however,
> no levels are set. These include frozen fish, seafood,
> wine, sweeteners and salt. Instead, the proposal refers to
> Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) as setting the benchmark
> for additive levels for these foods. GMP is not defined in
> the proposal, however.
> ¨ Comments due by 23rd December
>
> P189: Identity and Purity of Food Additives, Processing
> Aids, Vitamins, Minerals, etc.
> This proposal would remove all specifications governing
> the identity and purity of the above items from the Food
> Standards Code and replace them by a requirement that they
> comply with specifications outlined in a range of
> international publications. The only standard to remain in
> the Code specifies maximum allowable contents of lead,
> arsenic and heavy metals.
> ¨ Comments due by 23rd December
>
> P188: Processing Aids
> This proposal specifies several hundred processing aids
> that are allowed to be used in food processing and water
> purification, as well as the maximum permitted residues of
> most of those that may leave residues in food or water. The
> list of allowed processing aids includes extraction
> solvents such as toluene and trichloroethylene, as well as
> 32 enzymes, including four that are produced by genetically
> engineered bacteria.
> ¨ Comments due by 23rd December
>
> OTHER REPORTS
>
> Imported Food Safety
> A draft report of a review of the Imported Food Control
> Act 1992, which is administered by the Quarantine
> Inspection Service (AQIS), has been released for comment.
> It proposes that a partnership (or co-regulatory) approach
> be developed between government and food importers to
> ensure that the 10% of our food that is imported is safe
> for Australian consumers. Industry will be asked to take
> greater responsibility but regular government-controlled
> audits will continue, though on a reduced level for those
> businesses with a good food safety record.
> ¨ Comments due by 16th November.
> Report available from:
> AQIS, GPO Box 858, Canberra 2601.
> Ph 02 62724423, Fax 02 6272 4256.
>
> Strategic Objectives for Australia's Interests in Codex, 1998-2002
> Codex Alimentarius is the international body, which sets
> the food standards governing international trade in food.
> Australia's food standards are increasingly being aligned
> to Codex standards.
> Australia's National Codex Committee is seeking greater
> consumer involvement in their work.
> ¨ Report available from the National Codex Committee, c/-
> AQIS (see address above)
> Ph 02 6272 5112, Fax 02 6272 3103.
>
> (If any members of the Food Network are interested in
> receiving and commenting on Codex reports, via e-mail,
> please contact Dick Copeman at the network.)
>
> FEEDBACK WANTED
>
> Dick Copeman, coordinator of the Consumer Food Network,
> and editor of Consumer Food News, would like feedback from
> members of the network on the value to them of this
> newsletter. He would particularly like to receive
> suggestions for improvements or alterations to the
> newsletter, as well as copies of any submissions made to
> ANZFA.
>
> Dick Copeman
> Consumer Food Network
> 223 Logan Road, Buranda QLD 4102
> Ph 07 3217 3187, Fax 07 3217 3028
> Email: "Dick Copeman" <eco-cons@bit.net.au>
--
PACIFIC EDGE PERMACULTURE
Russ Grayson and Fiona Campbell
PO Box 446, Kogarah NSW 2217 AUSTRALIA
Permaculture education, publishing, design.
NSW contact, Australian City Farms and Community Gardens Network.
APACE Kastom Garden Program, (village agriculture), South Pacific.
PaD (Permaculture and Development) Project .