|
Dear RP
I'm not sure "totally" doesn't fit (though
perhaps it's fruitless to speculate about WP's thoughts). In "something to
displease both sides", Percy never wavered on the (total) wrongness of killing
unborn children. It's insanity and "totally", not partly, wrong. He was
merely pointing out the intellectual myopia that exists on both sides of the
political quagmire --and there is a lot of it. But, you're probably right that Percy would have surprised
and delighted and shocked with his comments.
Two very good friends of mine are
homosexual, one is in his late 60's and I speak with him regularly about these
sorts of things. He knows (and unfortunately has "known") a lot of homosexuals.
I can tell you there is hardly consensus among the homosexuals about what this
agenda is really about.
"Truth of gay love as a personal bond"? Hmm.... I love my best
friend (since kinder) probably more than I love anyone in the
world, but our "personal bond" is hardly a marriage, and I hardly want
to be sexual with him. But, even more to the point...what of my love
for my father? Love is not really a part of this debate.
The truth is, again citing my friend,
homosexual "bonds" are hardly about love and committment and the like. It's
mostly about sexual appetite and gratification.
Society's need to accept this? Society
needs to accept homosexuals, but not homosexuality.
Steve
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.