I think the "sad" part is they don't list all this info. in the contents.
I personally am not concerned about DDT. I have also read that all the negative press is not true.
Actually I like the smell of DDT: they used to have "foggers" on Jeeps spray the troop areas in VietNam. Of course I was in the "Bush" most of the time, that was where they sprayed 2,4 D.
Sadly, even DDT is found in -cides without being listed. I've run across mention of it in too many instances with
widely differing sources to conclude it is over-reported by a lunatic fringe.
Why 'sadly'?- other than the fact that it(DDT) or any other 'active' compound is not listed.
The 'sad' thing is that the DDT ban was based on hysteria fomented by a novel - and overrode all evidence produced by grounded scientific investigation.
DDT has gotten an undeservedly bad rap.
Re: [NAFEX] nafex Digest, Vol 93, Issue 1,
Larry D. Cook, 10/01/2010