The method reported of using 2 specific years 1950 and 1999 is flawed from the get-go IF that was reported correctly. I am going only by what was written at the link.
I think it was a bad subject with doom-and-gloom as the subject line. So I responded to it to try to help balance the subject. I think it was a bad subject and it's time to get back to real fruit production--now, and not chase future theoretical rabbits.
I like fruit. It tastes MUCH better than theory!
Best regards,
Richard
--- On Fri, 7/24/09, Stephen Sadler <Docshiva@Docshiva.org> wrote:
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.