To: "nafex@yahoogroups.com" <nafex@yahoogroups.com>
Subject: Re: [nafex] More on Stark
Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2001 20:55:52 -0400 (EDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Yes, I think Lon is right, except the need is now, just the recognition of
the need is lacking.
By the way, I have been unable to connect to the Cummins Nursery website
recently (dabney.com). Did their
address change? Are they having problems with their server? (Any
explanation other than that they've gone
too would be welcome).
Yorrba
On Fri, 06 Jul 2001 08:16:03 -0700, Lon J. Rombough wrote:
>Not to sound too grim, but NAFEX may need to serve the same purpose that
>monasteries did during the Dark Ages - keep varieties and knowledge alive
>until the need for them comes again.
>-Lon
>----------
>From: Tom Olenio <tolenio@sentex.net>
>To: nafex@yahoogroups.com
>Subject: Re: [nafex] More on Stark
>Date: Fri, Jul 6, 2001, 6:36 AM
>
>
>Hello,
>
>Lon is right, but there is something we can do about that...
>
>We are fruit explorers and tinker's right? We can do something unique if we
>put our collective abilities and resources together to do something
>"special".
>
>You get 2,300 people working on something as a team, and you will get
>results.
>
>We just have to decide what that something "special" is going to be.
>
>Regards,
>Tom
>
- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----
Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 OS/2 for non-commercial use
Comment: PGP 5.0 for OS/2