Lynda,
I didn't say anything about what you are accrediting to me below, and
it is not what the director said on his BBC america interview. Just to jump
into it anyway though...... The original data was destroyed, the product
of data entry, not copies of the originals is all that remains. Those
numbers now on file received "treatment" and are work product, not original
data. That much he admitted when questioned. It matters not one bit whether it
was Thursday or thirty years ago either, as it still means today we are
basing these claims on data that is not original and pure. If you don't
believe that scientists would twist things up a bit if it meant a steady stream
of research dollars, and if you do not believe politicians would work hand in
hand with scientists that would cheat, then you are never going to
understand why these admissions, and the leaked emails are very important. We are
supposed to be able to believe in what scientists tell us, they are
supposed to use the scientific method do get their answers and tell us when they
are merely guessing. It matters no one bit who is right or wrong here, but
the scientists who wrote of manipulating data to support their claims, and
worked hard to block publications of their peers that disagreed should be
fired. This is the data genius, internet inventor Gore used to base his
schlocumentary on..... By the way, did you see him on TV two nights ago claiming
the earth is millions of degrees just a short distance below the
surface???? hilarious.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.