Methinks there might be a lot more to this story that is not reported,
but that doesn't change my opinion that the judge overstepped his
authority. He could have simply denied support and ordered joint
custody without mandating public school. I'm not familiar with this
Sound Doctrine Church, but obviously some people believe it is a cult.
If the judge believed that, he may have mandated school as a means of
separating the children from what is in his view a cult influence. If
that were his true motivation, and I personally think it might be, then
his comments also make more sense. My feeling is that he was trying not
to be judgmental of another adult's religion, but perhaps saw this as a
middle ground??
I'm ambivalent about it, so maybe he was too???
B
DSanner106 AT aol.com wrote:
I tend to agree Rob, and without knowing their income situations, it
is hard to judge this ourselves from the sidelines.
In a message dated 3/13/2009 7:11:25 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,also
waltonrp AT gmail.com writes:
The judge has two parents with differing opinions and can't really
throw out the view of one parent because they have admitted to a
sin. I don't think that that is legislating from the bench.
What I'd challenge in this story is how this is encouraged by the
Obama administration?
--
I am having an out-of-money experience.
http://erthnsky.blogspot.com/
EarthNSky Farm, Northwest Georgia, USA
_______________________________________________
Homestead list and subscription:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
Change your homestead list member options:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/lurine%40com-pair.net
View the archives at:
https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.