You make a very good case , Wendy. One correction is that I think
President Reagan wanted to get the government off the backs of 'all'
business --big & small--not just big business. He also wanted to keep the
government off 'my' back and yours, something I do find appealing.
Unfortunately, he didn't account for the rapacicious greed and hubris
inherent in this present generation of moneychangers invilved in big
business and banking; not to the degree that the Congress would become
nothing more than their errand boys. And had he know that most all of the
titans of banking and industry would become and support liberal
democrats, he might have been red-faced.
I liked your critique, though, as much as I liked the original article. I
think that thousands of bankers; big business CEOs and board members; and
other various moneychangers 'and' politicians should be under federal and
state indictment , right now.
It will not happen, though. They own or frighten almost all of the
politicians, regardless of party identification. Only Ron Paul, Dennis
Kucinich, Jeff Flake and a few others will stand up to them, and those who
do are considered 'fringe' or 'nuts'..........
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.