I heard the president of PETA, once, make the statement that if she had the choice of either saving a drowning child or a dog, it would depend on whether the child was bright and attractive. Those are the PETA types that I consider irrational and dangerous.
I don't like all of this gov't involvement (projected in this article), but I also don't like animal abuse, whether they are pets or food animals. If I were given the option the PETA lady said, and the dog was 'my dog', for whom I care more than you can imagine; and the human , child or not, was a stranger, I would save the human. However, if I knew for a fact that the human was a recidivist armed robber or rapist or a person who hurt children; or an investment banker; I would save my dog. I guess everything is relative.........................bobford
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.