On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 11:09 AM, VAN DELL JORDAN <vdjor AT yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm curious how you define constitutionalist? Is that
> someone who takes literally, exactly what it says? Or
> someone who tries to interpret what the founders would
> say about an issue in todays world?
> Van Dell
Wouldn't it be wonderfull if that was the debate! I would define both
as being constitutionalist. I still see Ron Paul as the only choice,
even with BOTH of those definitions on the table.