Look again at how long you'd survive without the balance of critters. Human existence is also threatened by loss of that balance. Overabundance of only critters who live with man (vermin.) In order to pee in our drinking water? To monocrop grass plants we won't eat? To have our cars shine w protectorants on the sun vulnerable surface instead of dirt. To wash and recoat daily our colors of skin and hair? To meet "codes" of processing public dishes and cloth?As for critter versus human survival, that seems to me like a no-It's a serious, litigious<sp> brainer here. So, just for clarity, what
brainer.
side of the river are you on?
I am a human. So humans come first. If human existence is threatened by lesser animals' existence, well, nature is the law of the jungle and we are the rulers of the jungle. I, my family, my community and my fellow citizens drink before the critters.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.