shall we react to all this contentious "yes, it is, no, it isn't" arguing? Shall we act one way if global warming is affected by humans
and act another way if it is not? Seems to me we act the same no matter the answer. We seek lives as independent from the mainstream
economy as we are able to effect. The homesteader way provides a modicum of food and fuel security. It is a lifestyle that is morally
sound and economically pragmatic. It lives light on the Earth. And
it allows us to smile at the rabble rousers in the cities who fight> for an
audience.
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.