> O.K., so where are you disagreeing with what I said?
Oh, probably not. Not much anyway.
>So, while dyslexia is, in part, a learning style,
it isn't only a learning style but is also a visual and neurological
problem.
If it is a visual and neurological problem, it would be consistent would it
not? You would not expect to be able to talk the child out of being dyslexic
even for a moment, would you? Much as you can't talk a person out of being
deaf.
And yet, I never found one single instance where that was so.