You can't talk about after '45 when it was all in progress before '45. They already had all the components, they simply hadn't put them together.
So, with your self-declared "inhumane" way of dealing with what you consider to be a problem, can you tell me what seperates you from the folks you declare "thugs?"I didn't say it _would_ be inhumane, only that it sounded that way. The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few. Many more people died as a result of the Soviets' suppression of rebellions in Europe, the Vietnam War, the occupation of Tibet, and all the other atrocities that followed as a consequence of Truman's dovish back-turning in '45.
And, again, precisely and with adult language, if possible, how would you have kept all these countries from advancing their scientific knowledge? Eugenics perhaps? A holocaust of a different type? Kill all the scientific minds after they have been identified in all those countries? Screen all the children as they advance to an age where they might show some interest in science? Bomb the shit out of any country who even thinks about figuring out how to build a weapon?Once again, you just can't connect the dots, unless it's about whom the CEO of ENRON had lunch with.
Red, white and blue shirts goose stepping all over the world to control those nasty ol' folks who have an IQ higher than 70?
And, can you perhaps tell us where your U.S. supremist ideas came from? The U.S. shall rule the world because we are the choosen people? Do you perhaps wear a funny little mustache?
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.