To: "homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [Homestead] Wal-Mart Sovereignty
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:22:50 -0700
Wal-Mart Sovereignty
By CHRISTOPHER CALDWELL
Published: December 12, 2004
Americans claim they favor leaders who understand their wants, have a track
record of creating jobs and can be ruthless when required. Sounds like
Wal-Mart! Maybe that's why, last spring, the Arkansas-based retail behemoth
asked the citizens of Inglewood, Calif., to hand it the reins of
government. When the Inglewood City Council rejected Wal-Mart's bid to open
a 130,000-square-foot superstore, company executives did not sulk. They
disparaged the council as the captive of outside special interests,
particularly organized labor. And with the help of election professionals,
they collected more than 10,000 signatures to sponsor a ballot referendum
to reverse the decision. In the ensuing referendum campaign, the company
spent more than $1 million to convey the idea that it would create hundreds
of jobs and pump up the local tax base. Opponents emphasized what they saw
as the company's legacy of blighted downtowns and falling wages.
Ultimately, though, voters were most upset by something else: Wal-Mart's
initiative would have exempted the company from Inglewood's zoning,
planning and environmental laws and established a provision whereby the
deal could be altered only by a two-thirds vote of the public. By the time
voters rejected the initiative at the ballot box in April, this strategy
had acquired a name: Wal-Mart Sovereignty.
There's nothing new about the urge to turn economic power into political
power (and vice versa). Misgivings about it aren't new, either. But in
times of economic transformation, when society renegotiates what is public
and what is private, the questions that arise get really nettlesome. Should
inmates pay their debt to society through the middleman of a for-profit
prison company? Would you say no even if it meant more criminals on the
street? Should sports moguls pocket fortunes from publicly financed
stadiums? Would you say no even if it meant your city lost its baseball team?
For a long time, Wal-Mart steered clear of such quarrels. It was out of
sight, out of mind, building retail space mostly on the ahistorical,
apolitical exurban frontier. But more and more, it is encroaching on
communities that are more settled -- Inglewood is part of Los Angeles
County -- more ideological or snobbier. The Inglewood referendum won't be
the last time voters are invited to trade citizen rights for consumer
rights -- and no one should make any glib assumptions about which of those
rights Americans hold more dear.