To: "homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org" <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: [Homestead] Property owners' rights affirmed
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2004 09:03:40 -0700
SOUTH DAKOTA HUNTING TRESPASS LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL!
November 30, 2004 - For Immediate Release
Contact: William Perry Pendley
DENVER, CO. Two farming families in central South Dakota, who challenged
the constitutionality of a state law that denies them the right to prevent
hunters from trespassing on their property, today won the victory they
sought. A South Dakota Circuit Court, in response to motions for summary
judgment filed by the families and by State officials, called the law, "the
very kind of thing that the Takings Clause[, which] 'stands as a shield
against the arbitrary use of governmental power[,]' was meant to prevent,"
and ruled it "clearly and unmistakenly" unconstitutional because "it
violates constitutional principles." In so ruling, the court adopted the
arguments of Jeff and Tricia Messmer of Wessington Springs, in Jerauld
County, and Robert and Judith Benson of Winner, in Tripp County.
"We are thrilled with this victory for South Dakota property owners both
because the court applied the protections the U.S. and South Dakota
Constitutions accord property owners, as they were intended, and because
the court ignored the procedural ruse raised by South Dakota to prevent a
ruling on this issue," said William Perry Pendley of Mountain States Legal
Foundation, which represents the families. "We won the ruling we wanted:
that South Dakota cannot allow hunters to shoot onto private property."
Until recently, South Dakota law allowed hunting and fishing along section
lines or other highways if such rights-of-way are used for vehicular
traffic; however, hunters were not allowed to fire over or onto
privately-owned land without the landowners' permission. On March 22, 2003,
that law was amended to permit hunters to fire at and kill small game that
takes flight from a right-of-way. Under the new law, property owners are
barred from preventing hunters from firing over or onto their land at small
game that has traveled onto their land from the adjacent right of way.
The law affects a fundamental change in South Dakota law, which, for
decades, barred hunting on private property without the owners' permission
and recognized the right of owners to deny entry to all others. In
addition, the U.S. Supreme Court recognized consistently that the firing of
weapons over or onto private property is a physical invasion, which, in
turn, is an unconstitutional taking, that is, the taking "for public use"
of "private property" without "just compensation."
On October 22, 2003, the families filed their lawsuit. On January 5, 2004,
they filed a motion for summary judgment; South Dakota filed a similar
motion on February 27, 2004, to which the families replied on March 29,
2004, to which State officials responded on April 28, 2004. Oral arguments
took place on June 30, 2004.
Mountain States Legal Foundation is a nonprofit, public interest legal
center dedicated to individual liberty, the right to own and use property,
limited and ethical government, and the free enterprise system. Its offices
are in suburban Denver, Colorado.