|
> > Walter is *very* obviously
> > *not* referring to "Forest* > > in any way, shape, or form, > > since that implies a variety of trees > > with their various levels of overstory, etc. > > "useful" or not, > > over *centuries*. > Wrong Toni. Our forest have many layers and ages of trees, a great diversity of plants and animals. I suggest you learn about forestry so you'll be more informed for such a discussion. As it is you don't know what your talking about. I beg to differ, Sir. But I used your reply
to another person to answer - I hope
you will read the two books I suggested.
If you haven't already ? But you might
describe to me which "layers" you are
'pointing' me toward, and I am very
interested in the plants and animals in
your part of the country. In a word -
well, two - "educate me". Thank you !
Toni |
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.