|
James typed :
> The lender could take him to court and if the borrower made a case for
fraud, the lender is out of luck.
When you're already in debt because
you're borrowing - and the lender has
lotsa gelt - who will have the "better'
attorney ?
> The idea of Libertarianism in this is that the government should be
out of the whole picture as much as is at all possible.
Kinda like anarchy ?
> It is far harder to bribe every court and every jury in the country
than it is to bribe one president.
I don't think so. It only takes the
one you're depending on to see *your*
side ... 50-50 is more like it - and that is
provided the lender isn't his/her/their
relative/friend/golf partner, etc. Like
Cheney and that Supreme Court justice ....
Toni
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.