| Yes I am postulating that (A)KEM is related to (A)KAH. That is, if you pluralize -KAH to -KAYIM, it would naturally develop into -KEM. I don't have a theory for how the self-standing ATAH would engender the suffix -KAH. As for ATEM it seems more likely to me that it developed from ATAYIM, a possible edenic origin for TWO words like TWAIN and TWIN. Jonathan Mohler On Jul 24, 2013, at 10:02 AM, Isaac Fried wrote:
|
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.