|
Some more examples for the interaction-contraction of the personal pronouns אני ANIY, 'I', and אנו ANU, 'we', with the first letter of the verb in the hif'il form: גבה אַגְבִּיהַּ נַגְבִּיהַּ patax under the A, schwa under the G, dagesh in the B, Mapiq in the, radical, H. אכל אַאֲכִל נַאֲכִל xatap-patax, namely a patax/schwa compromise, under the second A. No dagesh in the K. ירד אוֹרִיד נוֹרִיד AO- and NO- יכח אוֹכִיחַ נוֹכִיחַ AO- and NO- יטב אֵיטִיב נֵיטִיב EIY- and NEY- יצב אַצִּיב נַצִּיב patax followed by a dagesh. נפל אַפִּיל נַפִּיל patax followed by a dagesh. נסע אַסִּיעַ נַסִּיעַ patax followed by a dagesh. ירה אוֹרֶה נוֹרֶה AO- and NO- קום אָקִים נָקִים qamatz, no dagesh in the Q. בוא אָבִיא נָבִיא qamatz, no dagesh no dagesh in the B. Isaac Fried, Boston University On Jul 23, 2013, at 2:59 PM, Isaac Fried wrote: 1. The NIYQUD is perplexing. It is conceivable that the different point marks are combinations to express certain compromises in the various reading traditions, and to also satisfy certain euphonic exigencies. |
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.