On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 08:00:13PM -0700, K Randolph wrote:
Nir:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Nir cohen - Prof. Mat. <nir AT ccet.ufrn.br>wrote:
dear karl,
you consider WY$TXW and H$TXWH as representing two different roots. i
suspect
that this interpretation is incorrect: i consider them the same root,
except
that a final H in WY$TXW was dropped by apocope, as is the rule in all the
LH-irregular roots, in the ("short") wayiqtol form: WYR), WYBK etc.
Whoops, I see I was a little too quick in answering, gave wrong examples.
I’ve got to stop this remembering something, then looking quickly to get
verse numbers.
Look at Genesis 27:29 there is both WY$XW and WY$XWW for plurals, and in
Genesis 43:28 there’s WY$TXW. Both cases, the Masoretes gave an assumed
Qere for a Kethiv, is there any evidence from the DSS that the Qere is
correct? If not, then stick with the Kethiv.
I think this is methodologically very questionable procedure.
Petr Tomasek
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.