|
karl,
>>> That’s why I understand that the two times BRNYWT is found in contexts that indicate that these are plural nouns, that they indicate that the singular noun BRNYH was in BH. This is a pattern that is found in Tanakh. pere and i never claimed otherwise. by the way, i suspect that the non-radical -NYH/-NYT singular suffix (as opposed to the -H/-YT suffix) in nouns (as opposed to adjectives) is a diminutive form. again, BYRH --> BYRNYT (capital --> central fortification) is the only BH example i know but see also XMH --> XMNYH (sunflower="small sun"), )ZNYH ("small ear"). nir cohen |
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.