Skip to Content.

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Charles Grebe <cgrebe AT briercrest.ca>
  • To: Donald Vance <donaldrvance AT me.com>
  • Cc: "b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org" <b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph
  • Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2012 04:26:02 +0000

Oh, how true. I've fallen for that one before too. I must look for that
missing dagesh lene! :)

Charles Grebe
Director of Continuing and Distance Education Briercrest College and Seminary
Caronport, SK, Canada

-----Original Message-----
From: Donald Vance [mailto:donaldrvance AT me.com]
Sent: Friday, January 20, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Charles Grebe
Cc: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] 2 Sam 7:3 qamets or qamets-hatuph

It is not in a closed syllable, therefore it is a qamats. The schwa under the
third bet is vocal (or at least medial) as indicated by the absence of a
dagesh lene in the kaph.


Donald R. Vance, Ph.D.
Professor of Biblical Languages and Literature Oral Roberts University
dvance AT oru.edu donaldrvance AT mac.com






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.