Please check again my previous post. This is a
Qal imperfect.
Also, please the note the that the root NTN
(Nun Tav Nun) is one of those verbs which 'misbehave'
or is irregular in the Qal.
For example: in the perfect - Gen 1:29;
imperfect - Gen 12:7 etc.
Uri Hurwitz Great Neck, NY
If the initial "n" is the first root letter "n" of "natan"... don't we
have here a piel-shaped verb form (nit:nah) rather than a qal-shaped one?
For comparison, "dib:rah" (Jb 33:2), she spoke, or "shilhah" (Pr 31:19),
she sent away...
Pere Porta
2011/12/6 Uri Hurwitz <uhurwitz at yahoo.com>
>
>
> -
> Both.
>
> It is the 'extended' imperfect ( 'moorakh'). Compare with the
> second verb in the same verse "nashuvah". Note, the 'He' in
> Mitzraymah is locative.
>
> Uri Hurwitz Great Neck NY
>
>
>
> -- On *Tue, 12/6/11, Pere Porta <pporta7 at gmail.com>* wrote:
>
> Yes.
> Now, what do you think about the first "n" in "nitnah" (Num 14:4):
>
> --is it a prefix (for "anu")
> --or is it the root letter "n" of "natan"?
>
> Regards
>
> Pere Porta